Keeping in mind a possible modification of the unification model, it would be worthwhile to learn more about the material causing the obscuration in the Schmitt et al. sample. For this purpose, X-ray spectroscopy provides us with a unique diagnostic tool. Seyfert galaxies are defined to be type 2 if there is obscuring material that is optically thick to visual light. However, the same column of material will not be optically thick for photons of sufficiently high energy. Direct nuclear emission can and often is observed in the X-ray waveband. Therefore, we can study the intervening material by studying the X-ray spectral features of Seyfert galaxies. We propose to examine the X-ray spectra of the galaxies in the Schmitt et al. sample in order to place constraints on the location and orientation of the absorbing material and to further probe their hypothesis.
Our sample consists of the 23 of the 46 galaxies in the Schmitt
et al. sample for which X-ray spectra are available from the ASCA
(Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics) archive. ASCA has
a bandpass of 0.5-10 keV. With an energy resolution of
2-4% around 6.4 keV, it has a higher energy resolution than
contemporaneous X-ray observatories.
Our plan is to fit models of the following basic form:
Overall, we will keep the spectral model components as simple as possible. Spectrum1 will be fit with a power law. Spectrum2 includes a power law continuum component and an emission feature for the iron fluorescence line. We will also consider adding a model component for reflection off of a cold, dense cloud. This would modify the flux entering the absorbing column of the torus by assuming there are two contributors to the incident light; one representing direct illumination, and the other with a spectrum modified by Compton scattering and atomic features representing the light reflected off the opposite side of the inner torus edge. In this case, spectrum2 will be modeled as follows:
Photons in the range of 2-10 keV are not completely blocked by
photoelectric absorption until NH nears
[Kallman and Mushotzky, 1985]. We can therefore use the X-ray spectrum to measure
column densities for absorber2 up to this level. By fitting
for two values of NH, we will be able to discriminate between
absorption which is due to localized obscuration such as the torus and
that which is global due to the host galaxy. We expect that type 1
Seyferts will have a small NH, and the other Seyfert types will have
a range of values for the tori column densities. (Note that each of
these values is in fact a lower limit for the thickness of each torus,
because we can not directly constrain its orientation. The best we
could do is use the standard assumption that the torus axis is
parallel to the observed radio axis, but we would not know the angle
of projection between this axis and the plane of the sky.)
Our goals are (1) to compare the spectral indices of the different
types, and (2) to compare the intrinsic X-ray power of both Seyfert
types. This will tell us whether there are any systematic differences
between the type 1 and type 2 AGN engines. We will also (3) determine
the energy of the Fe K-
line, which will indicate the
ionization state of the gas producing it. Finally, we will
(4) measure the equivalent width of the fluorescence line, which we
will combine with the measured NH values and the theoretical models
of Ghisellini [Ghisellini et al., 1994] and Krolik [Krolik et al., 1994] in order to
constrain the density, the Fe abundance, and the inclination of the
torus relative to the orientation of the galaxy and the accretion disk.